In plain language. An emergency arbitrator handles the situations that cannot wait — where assets
might be dissipated or property altered in the weeks it takes to appoint a full tribunal.
The legal meaning. Emergency arbitrator provisions are a feature of institutional rules rather
than the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 itself. Leading Indian and international institutions,
including the MCIA under its 2025 Rules, provide for appointment of an emergency arbitrator within a
very short window to decide an urgent application. The draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment)
Bill 2024 proposed giving emergency arbitration express statutory recognition.
A practical example. A joint-venture partner learns that the other side is about to transfer the
disputed asset to a third party. The arbitration clause names an institution with emergency arbitrator
provisions. The aggrieved party applies, an emergency arbitrator is appointed within days, and an
order restraining the transfer is made — long before the three-member tribunal could be constituted.
The alternative route. Where no emergency arbitrator mechanism applies, a party can apply to court
for interim measures under Section 9 of the Act before the tribunal exists. Once constituted, the
tribunal itself can grant interim measures under Section 17, enforceable as orders of the court.
Why it matters. Urgency is the classic argument for going to court rather than arbitrating.
Emergency arbitrator provisions substantially narrow that gap, which is part of why institutional
arbitration has gained ground over ad hoc arbitration.
General information only — not legal advice and not a solicitation.