In plain language. Party autonomy means the dispute is yours, and so are the rules for resolving
it. In court you take the procedure you are given; in arbitration and mediation you largely design it.
The legal meaning. Party autonomy runs throughout the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The
Act repeatedly frames its provisions as applying unless the parties have agreed otherwise — on the
number of arbitrators, the appointment procedure, the rules of procedure, the place of arbitration and
the language. The Act's mandatory provisions, such as equal treatment of parties and a reasonable
opportunity to present one's case, mark the outer limit of that freedom.
A practical example. Two parties agree that their dispute will be decided by a sole arbitrator with
expertise in construction, seated in Bengaluru, under institutional rules, in English, on documents
only without oral hearings. None of those choices would be available in court.
Where autonomy stops. Parties cannot contract out of the requirement to treat each other equally,
cannot arbitrate matters the law reserves for courts, and cannot agree procedures that would render an
award unenforceable on public policy grounds.
Why it matters. Party autonomy is why the arbitration clause you draft at contract stage matters so
much. Every element you leave unspecified falls back to a statutory default that may not suit you. The
guide to drafting an arbitration clause covers the choices worth making deliberately.
General information only — not legal advice and not a solicitation.